ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Cognitive screening via telehealth is increasingly employed, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telephone adaptations of existing cognitive screening tests must be validated across diverse populations. The present study sought to evaluate an existing 26-point telephone adaptation of the Mini-Mental State Examination (tMMSE) in a sample of older Aboriginal Australians. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate a telephone adaptation of the urban version of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment short-form (tKICA screen). METHODS: A sub-sample (n = 20) of participants (aged 55-69 years; 11 women) who had completed an in-person cognitive assessment (MMSE and KICA screen) within the past 6 months as part of the Koori Growing Old Well Study completed telephone-based cognitive testing without an assistant. RESULTS: There was moderate correlation and reasonable agreement between MMSE versions (rs = 0.33; p = 0.2), although the limits of agreement were unacceptably wide (-4.1 and 4.8 points difference). Poorer performance was seen on the tMMSE for Season (p = 0.02) and Phrase (p = 0.02) items, and better performance for three-word Recall (p = 0.03). KICA-screen versions were poorly correlated (rs = 0.20; p = 0.4) with telephone scoring a mean of 2.17 points below the face-to-face score, greater bias observed at the lower end of the performance and worse scores for Season (p = 0.02) and Recall (p = 0.001) items. Age and education were not associated with telephone screening performance. Hearing impairment was associated with poorer performance on the tKICA screen (p = 0.04) but not the tMMSE (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that telephone administration of the MMSE and/or KICA screen is not equivalent to in-person testing for older Aboriginal people, and further revision and evaluation are required.
ABSTRACT
The article reports that While the COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly catalyzed the adoption of more flexible datacollection approaches within clinical trials, this has been the direction of travel for some time. Rather than bringing participants into sites, allowing them to participate from the safety of their own homes by leveraging remote datacollection methods placed participant preference at the center of the research effort and positively impacted participant engagement.
ABSTRACT
Today, in rural isolated areas or so-called 'medical deserts', access to diagnosis and care is very limited. With the current pandemic crisis, now even more than ever, telemedicine platforms are gradually more employed for remote medical assessment. Only a few are tailored to comprehensive teleneuropsychological assessment of older adults. Hence, our study focuses on evaluating the feasibility of performing a remote neuropsychological assessment of older adults suffering from a cognitive complaint. 50 participants (aged 55 and older) were recruited at the local hospital of Digne-les-Bains, France. A brief neuropsychological assessment including a short clinical interview and several validated neuropsychological tests was administered in two conditions, once by Teleneuropsychology (TNP) and once by Face-to-Face (FTF) in a crossover design. Acceptability and user experience was assessed through questionnaires. Results show high agreement in most tests between the FTF and TNP conditions. The TNP was overall well accepted by the participants. However, differences in test performances were observed, which urges the need to validate TNP tests with broader samples with normative data.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) is a composite score which can detect the first signs of cognitive impairment, which can be of importance for research and clinical practice. It is designed to be administered in person; however, in-person assessments are costly, and are difficult during the current COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of performing the PACC assessment with videoconferencing, and to compare the validity of this remote PACC with the in-person PACC obtained previously. METHODS: Participants from the HEalth and Ageing Data IN the Game of football (HEADING) Study who had already undergone an in-person assessment were re-contacted and re-assessed remotely. The correlation between the two PACC scores was estimated. The difference between the two PACC scores was calculated and used in multiple linear regression to assess which variables were associated with a difference in PACC scores. FINDINGS: Of the 43 participants who were invited to this external study, 28 were re-assessed. The median duration in days between the in-person and the remote assessments was 236.5 days (7.9 months) (IQR 62.5). There was a strong positive correlation between the two assessments for the PACC score, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0·82 (95% CI 0·66, 0·98). The multiple linear regression found that the only predictor of the PACC difference was the time between assessments. INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence on the feasibility of performing cognitive tests online, with the PACC tests being successfully administered through videoconferencing. This is relevant, especially during times when face-to-face assessments cannot be performed.